New at BOP: Review: Matrix Resurrections Movie Review: Moonfall Movie Reviews: Scream The #1 Movie in America November Forecast The Many Saints of Newark October Forecast New Trivia Question All site updates Share & Save   Tweet Print this column

One man who noticed was also the man would eventually kill him, Dan White (Josh Brolin). White and Milk did not see eye-to-eye on a number of financial issues, and after White resigns from the Board, Milk encourages the mayor not to give White his job back. On November 27, 1978, White assassinated the mayor and Milk, an act many considered the result of White's poor diet (it would later become known as the "Twinkie Defense").

The subject matter of Milk alone makes it interesting, but it's compelling and effective because it has what any great movie should - exceptional performances, superb production values, well-paced editing, humor, and heavy emotional payoffs. The latter come mostly from observing Milk's heroism and endurance, as well as his romantic relationships to Scott and Jack Lira (Diego Luna). He also built a strong friendship with the young activist Jack Cleves (Emile Hirsch). Black's screenplay and Van Sant's direction give each of the characters ample time for development and the cast works very well together.

When I first learned Sean Penn was playing Harvey Milk, I suspected he might overact (see I Am Sam) and turn Milk's showiness into a cartoon. Penn doesn't remotely play Milk that way. He embodies and creates one of the most likable and genuine characters in the movies this year. There are moments when I can see Penn in the role, but I think that helps because Penn, a well-known liberal, sneaks in his own views that agree with Milk's and the two go hand in hand. In this case, from a political perspective, we have an actor playing what he knows.

The other performances from Luna, Hirsch, and Brolin (who's having another terrific acting year with this and W.) are just as effective, but I think the best performance comes from Franco. Hitherto now, Franco has played roles overshadowed by the leads (Spider-Man), but this year he's worked to become a stronger presence on-screen (Pineapple Express). As Milk's longtime lover and supporter, he generates a complicated, nuanced performance through behavior and facial expressions. He doesn't allow "Scotty" to be pushed aside, which makes the ending all the more poignant.

Using a lot of file footage, along with costumes, makeup and production design, Milk accurately recreates its time and immerses us in the history of 30 years ago. But - and this is important - it works as a film experience because Van Sant makes the story special outside of its historical context. Harvey Milk could have just as easily been a fictional hero and this film still would have been fascinating and emotionally gripping. That's the mark of not only a good biopic, but any movie based on actual events. The question shouldn't be, does it work as a film based on fact, but rather, does it work as a film? A film can be as accurate as it wants, but that doesn't necessarily make it good. It's easy to state facts, but Van Sant, who shows a lot of affection towards the main character and his followers, also makes it entertaining, which is what a film should be before it's anything else.

I did not know much about Harvey Milk before this film came along, and now I want to know more. That's always been the power and draw of the movies - they open our eyes to people and events we might not otherwise have known. In the end, Harvey Milk solemnly expresses on his tape recorder, "You've got to keep giving the people hope. You've got to give them hope." Harvey, you did and this film does.

Continued:       1       2