Book vs. Movie: The Rite
By Russ Bickerstaff
February 2, 2011
Baglio’s prose in The Rite doesn’t quite have the impact of either journalistic or critically insightful approaches to the unknown. The text weaves back and forth from simple, textbook-style historical prose and straightforward, commercial narrative delivery. Some of his choices feel a bit odd. The book opens with a narrative describing an exorcism. Only in the notes at the end of the book is it revealed that the description is rendered from an audio recording that the author had access to. The journalistic approach would have perhaps been to transcribe the tape’s audio in print. It would’ve had the effect of introducing the reader to the book’s subject matter in a raw form that would’ve been much more effective. A Ronson-like approach to it may have been to autobiographically describe receiving the tape and listening to it, complete with personal reactions to it in a way that was both funny and provocative. Baglio’s fiction-like narration of the exorcism as delivered to the page at the beginning of the book felt uninspired. In one form or another, much of the book suffers from this lack of inspiration in presentation.
This is not to say that it doesn’t have its strengths. Baglio’s narrative is very character-driven. We get a very personal look at the background of a man who had been in the mortuary business prior to joining the priesthood and eventually recruited to go to Rome to study exorcism. The strength of this lies in its ability to deliver the personal-level interest of a subject matter that may not seem all that significant beyond the suffering of individuals.
Baglio’s exorcists come across as a combination of a few different quite mundane professions. On the one hand, they come across as physicians. Evidently, the practice of the exorcist is a lot less glamorous than Max Von Sydow made it look in 1973. Exorcisms evidently take numerous sessions over the course of several years. People aren’t bedridden with demonic afflictions so much as they are inconvenienced by them. In this light, the possession ends up coming across much less dramatically — it’s more of an existential infection than a complete takeover of a host body. Also — the exorcists of Baglio’s The Rite seem to handle the job almost full-time. They seem a bit like exterminators in this respect. And then there’s the fact that these demons are out of hell on some kind of parole. They don’t seem to take pleasure in the suffering they’re causing — it’s just a side effect of them moving from Hell (an unpleasant place) to our world (a less unpleasant place.) In this respect, the exorcists come across like case workers. It’s all very mundane stuff, which doesn’t exactly lend itself towards seeming all that interesting. It’s more of a curiosity than anything.
Perhaps part of the significance I’m missing here lies in the fact that I grew up outside religion - Judeo-Christian or otherwise. The world is a lot more complicated than simple black or white Good vs. Evil. In the modern world, the most profound suffering and destruction is caused by human apathy and otherwise blameless self-interest. On an individual level, it’s perfectly okay and nothing to be ashamed of, but when hundreds of thousands of people are all acting in such a manner, huge injustices erupt. The very worst things in the world aren’t caused by outright malevolence — just lack of perspective. That’s life in the world of quantum causality. Without even glancing in the direction of the bigger, modern picture its author is treading in the shadow of, The Rite feels kind of silly and inconsequential.
Continued:
1
2
3
|
|
|
|